When Andras Peto was published readers were asked to let us know what they thought of it, if they had enjoyed it and learnt from it.
One such review was sent to me this week by Rony Schenker. She has read it twice now, and felt the same as I did when I read the memories and descriptions included.
She says:
The
accumulative impression that you get from reading the book with bated
breath is one of the things that makes this book so special. It is as
if you had the opportunity to watch Prof. Pető walking into a room
where children were working, to hear him, to see him seating by his
desk and writing, having a nice meal with friends, or talking eye to
eye with his patients. So vivid the descriptions are. And then, what
I know, what I saw with my own eyes, what I have learned through my
own experience, informal learning and excessive readings and
discussions with many and goods, and from my repeated visits to the
Pető Institute (October 1987
was the first). And then, the fusion of all of this information,
melting into a higher degree of coherence, or preferably, into a more
coherent puzzle.
She also comments on the useful references it includes:
Currently,
these are very good references for those who want to know, for those
who think they know, and for those who should know what Conductive
Education is and who was Professor Pető.
Thank you very much for your appreciative comments, Rony.
Another interesting review has been written by Susie Mallett and can be found at
Have you read it? If so, please send me or Andrew your thoughts. If not, you can obtain a copy by clicking on the cover of the book on the right-hand side of this blog.
